March 28, 2008
Chelsea: Mom Would Be A Better Prez Than Dad
ALLENTOWN, PA - Chelsea Clinton was asked whether her mother would be a better president than her father, and she said yes. Speaking at Lehigh Valley Hospital today, she laughed when a man in the front row asked her to choose between her parents.
"His question is, 'Do I think my mother will be a better president than my father,'" she said. "Well, again, I don't take anything for granted, but hopefully with Pennsylvania's help, she will be our next president, and yes, I do think she'll be a better president."
Clinton spoke for more than an hour at the hospital, taking mostly questions about healthcare issues.
(NBC/NJ's MATTHEW BERGER)
Posted at 02:11 PM
Comments
Wow. Those Clinton's really will say and do anything for power.
The apple doesn't fall far from the tree I guess.
Matt | 03.28.08 02:39 PM
 |
It's not exactly setting the bar very high, is it? Come to think of it, the more that all three Clintons talk, the more her poll numbers plummet.
Paul | 03.28.08 03:40 PM
|
No one objects to a honest and healthy debate, but what they do object to is one based upon lies, smear, distortion -- swiftboating and/or the Tonya Harding, however, Tonya Harding was sent packing in disgrace. And does she have to divide and separate the country by Gender & Race while she is Pressing on to win the top job?
This is a New Era -- the Age of Aquarius/Brotherhood. It is about turning the page — it is the old separative and corrupt politicians vs. the new moral/ethical politicians (I call them the New Age Politicians as they work on building a more holistic and unified society.)
Camp Clinton, is enraged with Barack that people have discovered that Hillary has a “truth” problem, that she got caught telling that horrendous tall tale, “the Bosnian Sniper Fire” story and now everyone knows her true character and the depths she will go to embellish her own persona, and the fact that now people are skeptical to believe anything that she says... However, I am surprised that Andrea Mithcell, who went on that trip with her, never reported that there wasn't any Sniper fire until it became public knowledge, though Hillary had told that story three (3) times before, yet Andrea does think it is her personal mission to dig up old sermons of Rev. Wright’s and expose them to the public. Rev. Wright is no worse than Pat Buchanan who is allowed to make a cushy salary on talk shows while he continually is allowed to speak in ways which introduces fear, separatism and hate within our society, and he has been getting away with it for years! And, if that is not Anti-American, I do not know what is! He continually makes "controversial" and "racist" statements, and just gets a pat-on-the back. He is the very thing he accuses Rev. Wright of and worse. Yet, Rev. Wright's words would be pertienent except for the fact that we are electing a President, Not a Pastor, and those are Rev. Wright’s words NOT Barack’s, as in the Sniper Fire Story which are Hillary’s and Hillary’s alone.
Then there is the statement Hillary likes to make “that she would never meet with her enemies”, than why did she meet and sit down with her Arch Enemy, Richard Mellon Scaife, to re-introduce the Rev. Wright matter. This is the same Richard Scaife, who accused Hillary and Bill of Vince Foster’s murder, 60 murders in all, and was their personal persecutor and devil while they were in the White House and took them on a witch hunt for years, What’s that about, what did she really tell him?
In her desire to make Barack look unelectable it seems, instead, the Chickens are Coming Home to Roost.
BacaAngel | 03.29.08 09:08 AM
|
I have other things to worry about,and it isn't will Hillary win the white house.I'm 81 years old and living on a small fixed income.Two years ago I bought a small 51.000 dollar house, payments would be no problem for me.The Lending company sold my mortgate to Flagstar Mortgage Co.After a few short months they sold my mortgage to Citi Mortgage.I had Formers home owners insurance,that is all I signed for when buying my house.Didn't have any private insurance, only had to pay closing cost about 4.000 dollars.My credit was so good they didn't need any down payment.Now Citi Mortgage after they had my mortgage for over a year sends my a statment saying I need to pay them over 1.000 for private insurance for the over a year they have had my mortgage. Now after I pay the the back payment for insurance I didn't have, never signed for my payments would be much higher.The insurance is with Citi Mortgage not giving me any chance to shop around for a better price.Remember with Flagstar I had no such private insurance and my house payment was small.How can they charge me for a policy I didn't even have? They looked after a year and found I didn't have enough money to cover such insurance,now i must pay for something I didn't even have.This is very wrong,but what can I do about it? Help, Mary
Mary | 03.30.08 09:58 AM
|
Post a comment
The Watergate · 600 New Hampshire Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20037
202-739-8400 · fax 202-833-8069
NationalJournal.com is an Atlantic Media publication.
